Lutheran Church Of Hope
A Website That Grows with Its Church

Project overview
During my time at Strategic America, I led the redesign of a site that struggled to support streaming, digital ministry and multiple campuses. The result was a clearer, more unified experience that makes information easy to find and simplifies updates for every team.
Duration
• June 2022 – November 2023
Role
• Lead UX/UI Designer
• User Research Support
Team
• 1 UX Designer
• 1 Project Manager
• 1 Client Manager
• 3 Web Developers
• 1 Web Administrator
• 1 UX Researcher
• 1 Communications Director
Tools
• Adobe XD
• Adobe Illustrator
• Adobe Photoshop
• Optimal Workshop
• Octopus.do
• Microsoft Excel
• WordPress
The Challenge
The biggest issue was fragmentation—both for users and for the people managing the site. Each campus handled content differently, important tasks were buried, and the tools powering the site weren’t built for how the church operates today.
Key Problems
1. “We can’t find anything.”
Calendars, classes, volunteer sign-ups, and event updates were confusing or hard to navigate. The site lacked a strong organizational overview.
2. A structure that no longer fits.
The CMS wasn’t designed for multiple unique campuses, growing digital offerings or adding new locations in the future.
3. Too much work for staff.
Shared content was difficult to maintain and updates for each campus had to route through a central team.
4. A homepage that didn’t tell their story.
Worship wasn’t front and center, and key content like video, outreach and the podcast were easy to miss.
5. Technical complexity behind the scenes.
The site needed to support multiple systems—events and class management, employment listings, payments, and streaming—while improving search and discoverability across calendars and offerings.

The homepage didn’t give new users a good sense of who they were. Existing church members had a hard time finding common tasks.

The class search wasn’t intuitive and didn’t show the breadth of classes available at first glance.
Discovery
Discovery focused on understanding where the website was falling short for both users and staff—and why. The findings revealed a clear disconnect between the strength of the church’s ministry work and how easily people could access it online.

Internal survey
To better understand internal pain points, we surveyed church staff and ministry leaders across campuses. The results reinforced what we were hearing anecdotally—and revealed deeper opportunities around clarity, content, and ease of use.
- Staff feedback strongly reinforced what we’d already heard: navigation, search, and finding classes or events were the biggest pain points.
- Strong ministry work and meaningful content existed, but much of what makes the church unique wasn’t visible or easy to find online.
- Classes and events were too tightly tied to the calendar, making browsing, filtering, and planning ahead difficult.
- Leaders wanted the site to be easy: less clutter, clearer language, and obvious next steps.
- Most people arrive at the site through word of mouth, using it to confirm details and take action—not to discover the church from scratch.

Competitor analysis
I reviewed websites from churches of similar size and complexity to better understand how they approach navigation and information architecture. The goal wasn’t to copy patterns, but to see how comparable organizations label and organize large amounts of content, support multiple campuses, and guide users through complex experiences—and where we might be able to improve.
- Many sites rely on overly simplified main navigation with very few links, which looks clean at first but often creates confusion upon a deeper look.
- Broad, vague labels without dropdown menus or supporting context make it harder for users to understand what content lives where.
- When navigation doesn’t provide clues upfront, users are forced into trial-and-error clicking.
of participants couldn’t find how to volunteer
couldn’t find addiction support content.
of participants couldn’t find how to volunteer
Tree test
To get some outside feedback on the current website’s navigation labels and content groupings, we ran a tree test with 50 participants across a wide range of faith backgrounds. The goal was to understand how successfully users can locate common, high-intent tasks—such as finding worship times, joining a group, or seeking support—using the current structure alone, without visual design cues. This helped give clear insight into where the information architecture was breaking down.
- Navigation labels were the biggest barrier. Across nearly every task, participants struggled not because content was missing, but because labels like Next Steps, Care, Serve, and Give were unclear or overlapping in meaning.
- People relied heavily on guessing—and on Search. Search was used in every task, often as a fallback when categories didn’t match expectations. Next Steps was a first click for every single task, signaling confusion rather than clarity.
- Worship and Watch performed well when clearly labeled. Live streaming was the most successful task, confirming that clear, action-oriented labels work—even within a larger navigation system.
- Classes, groups, and support were especially hard to find. Tasks related to classes, small groups, volunteering, childcare, and care services had very low success rates, with users scattering across many unrelated sections.
- Broad, vague categories hurt discoverability. Simplified navigation labels without context forced users into trial-and-error clicking. Participants often landed “close,” but not efficiently.
Proposed sitemap
Using the insights from the studies, we translated the research findings into a new sitemap that prioritized clarity over simplicity. The structure focused on grouping content in ways that matched user expectations, reducing ambiguous labels, and making high-intent tasks—like worship, getting involved, finding support, and planning ahead—easier to locate.
Design
I began the design phase by translating the research insights into clear, usable structure before exploring visual expression. Wireframes were used to resolve navigation, content structure, and user pathways—prioritizing high-intent tasks before introducing visual style. This allowed the structure to be validated first, ensuring the experience was intuitive and scalable across campuses
Visual layouts then built on that structure to reinforce hierarchy, improve scannability, and reflect the personality of the church—creating a cohesive, welcoming experience that supports both in-person and online engagement.
Wireframes
High-fidelity Layouts
The Result
One platform. Seven campuses. A seamless experience. The redesign delivered a clear, scalable website that finally matched the church’s growth—solving usability challenges and giving staff the tools to manage content efficiently.
By the Numbers
In the year following launch, organic search sessions increased 14% year over year. Engagement rate climbed from 55.8% to 59.4%, and average engagement time from organic search visitors more than doubled, growing from 36 seconds to 1 minute 21 seconds.
Key outcomes
Navigation that works
Page layouts and menus prioritize clarity over vague or overly simplified labels.
Information upfront
Key details are shown directly on pages, reducing reliance on the calendar.
Tasks made simple
Clearer pathways to core tasks like worship, classes, volunteering, support, and missions.
CMS built for teams
Each campus can manage its own content while keeping a shared, consistent structure.
Ready for the future
The flexible system can support new campuses without starting over.
Together, these changes align user needs, content strategy, and day-to-day management, creating a strong foundation for growth.


